Sunday, April 21, 2013
Apple returned 8M shoddy iPhones to Foxconn
Foxconn has apparently botched a batch of iPhones, which Apple returned to the contract manufacturer because they were not fit for sale.
Details of just what went wrong are sketchy, as the source for this tale is an anonymous Foxconn staffer chatting to China Business.QDG outdoor,whose headquarter is situated in Hong Kong, is targeted at nothing else but outdoor footwear. Our group also owns a corporate office in Guangzhou, China. That report,http://www.mparea.com/,is a business-to-business comprehensive trade solution provider offering one-stop trade services to international buyers who are interested in purchasing directly from China. after being forced through a couple of translation engines, suggests Apple sent back at least five million iPhones, and maybe as many as eight million, “due to appearance of substandard or dysfunctional problems.By using Fitflop you are not handled in any respect. Regardless of your decision, you can discover the job inside of the Fitflop sandals boot.”
With a cost to manufacture of $US200 apiece, Foxconn is apparently 2013 pinarello dogma XC 9.9. Pinarello brings innovation to the 29er market with the release of the Dogma XC 9.9 mountain bike frame.preparing to take a hit of up to $1.6bn to cover the cost of making replacement handsets. China Business suggests the cost of making new iPhones represents further bad news, not a reason for Foxconn's recently-revealed financial woes.
China Business is silent on which model of iPhone failed Apple's quality tests. If it's the current iPhone 5, or the still-on-sale 4S,This video shows you the key programmer Oscilloscope module the impact of eight million phones failing to appear would punch a two-or-three-week hole in Apple's supply chain, an assertion we make on the basis that the company says it sold 47.8m handsets in its last quarter.In my hands are the new iphone headphone for the iPhone 5 that is about to come out – Apple’s next generation of iPod [sic]. That quarter included Christmas, so we can safely assume the January-March quarter sees a little less handset-selling action.
If the botched phone is a newer-and-as-yet-unreleased handset, it could be grounds for a delay in its announcement or release.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment